Editorial: The Collapse of the RSF Militia
The successive and unexpected defections within the militia’s leadership confirm that it is breathing its last, both in terms of public perception and its actual capabilities. This is largely due to the tremendous efforts exerted by the Sudanese army in the Darfur and Kordofan regions. These achievements have caused panic and confusion within the militia’s ranks.
How can it continue fighting without field commanders to lead it?
Events have consistently shown that no militia, regardless of the amount of support it receives in terms of weapons and supplies, can defeat a professional national army like the Sudanese army, which enjoys a globally recognized reputation and is distinguished by its military planning and tactics, which are studied in military institutions.
Wars are not merely about weapons; they are a combination of decisive leadership, sound tactics, and meticulous strategic planning.
These factors give regular armies the ability to prevail against insurgencies and irregular armed groups.
It was clear from the outset that this war was only a matter of time before it ended with the army’s victory and the collapse of the militia. Now, with the militia having lost a significant portion of its field presence and influence, it has become increasingly difficult for it to confront Sudanese forces. The series of defections of prominent leaders, the latest being a key and well-known field commander, has dealt another severe blow, leading to a decline in its strength and a collapse in the morale of its members. These repeated leadership losses increase the likelihood of further defections in the coming period.
These developments are prompting external powers, such as those who previously supported the militia, like the UAE, to consider alternative scenarios for destabilizing Sudan. There are already indications of attempts to open new fronts in the east in cooperation with Ethiopia, with the aim of diverting the army and destabilizing the country. However, it is clear that these efforts will not succeed in light of the effective diplomatic, political, and media initiatives led by Sudan.
We are now witnessing the beginning of the end we have long anticipated. The liberated areas are increasing, and news of the lifting of the siege is dominating the scene. With the militia’s continued internal divisions and the cessation of political activities by its loyalists, coupled with declining external support, stability in Sudan appears to be within reach. Military figures and their loyal supporters are working diligently and resolutely, and with each passing day, the Sudanese army proves itself to be the recognized force capable of maintaining a unified and secure nation.