The Face of Truth: Friends of Sudan and the Humanitarian Response
Ibrahim Shaglawi
The arrival of aid convoys at Sudanese border crossings—whether those launched by the Humanitarian Aid Commission, the Egyptian convoy arriving via the Ashkeit crossing in Wadi Halfa locality, the assistance provided by the King Salman Humanitarian Aid and Relief Center in North Kordofan State, or the Turkish initiative through the “Hope Caravan Foundation” and the “European Orphans Relief Association”—represents steps that demonstrate the state’s ability to manage the crisis within its humanitarian, ethical, and legal responsibilities.
The aid shipments, loaded with food and medical supplies, constitute living proof that the state is capable of protecting its citizens even in areas under militia control, without compromising its sovereignty or dismantling the social security system.
Politically, the decision to open crossings to all regions establishes a fundamental principle in crisis management: the protection of civilians must be kept outside any political or military considerations. This approach blocks any attempts to politicize suffering and places the state in a position of moral and legal strength. It also reflects a strategic understanding that societal stability is a prerequisite for the sustainability of any political or security track.
No less important than this internal dimension is the regional and international role in supporting Sudan. Alongside the Egyptian initiative, Saudi Arabia plays a clear role through the King Salman Humanitarian Aid and Relief Center, which distributed 2,300 food baskets to families as part of the 2025 Food Security Support Project, targeting thousands of beneficiaries. Qatar also continues its relief efforts by supporting shelter projects and medical services. Turkish organizations such as the “Hope Caravan Foundation” and the “European Orphans Relief Association” contribute by providing assistance to thousands of people, at a time when Sudan is facing a severe humanitarian crisis affecting nearly 25 million people, including 14 million children, amid worsening food insecurity, lack of clean water, health services, and forced displacement.
This multi-party coordination demonstrates Sudan’s ability to mobilize regional and international partnerships and transform the humanitarian crisis into a bridge for political cooperation. It also sets clear standards for managing humanitarian intervention within state sovereignty, while preserving legitimacy and international humanitarian law.
Sudan is betting that the humanitarian response will extend to include all regional and international friends, so that the current crisis becomes an opportunity to demonstrate genuine solidarity with the Sudanese people and to support its institutions in crisis management. Sudanese people also hope that contributions will expand to include the provision of food, clean water, medical services, and shelter for displaced and affected families, with a focus on protecting children, women, and the most vulnerable groups, and that international actors will commit to ensuring the continuity of funding and technical support for state and organizational initiatives.
Sudan also looks forward to more effective coordination among donors, the Commission, and regional organizations, enabling a faster and more effective response, reducing duplication of efforts and humanitarian gaps, and affirming that the protection and relief of civilians must be an absolute priority, far removed from any political calculations.
Local voluntary work also plays a complementary role, as experience shows that the Humanitarian Aid Commission and national voluntary organizations play a pivotal role in managing the effects of displacement and mitigating the social repercussions of the crisis. However, weak coordination and the multiplicity of decision-making centers necessitate the establishment of unified national mechanisms capable of organizing the efforts of the state and regional and international partners, and transforming humanitarian work into a platform for rebuilding trust and sustaining care.
In this context, and according to #The_Face_of_Truth, this experience reveals a clear strategic and developmental significance: humanitarian initiatives from Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey come as a political and moral lever that enables Sudan to preserve its sovereignty and legitimacy, and to establish sustainable regional and international partnerships. From this standpoint, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, and Egypt initiate humanitarian tracks as measures supporting the efforts of the Sudanese government to take initiative and leadership in managing humanitarian crises within an integrated ethical and political framework.
Wishing you continued well-being and health.
Sunday, January 4, 2026
Shglawi55@gmail.com