Face of Truth: Kamil to New York to Win the Diplomatic Battle..

Ibrahim Shaglawi

In a remarkable move that reflects a calculated shift in the Sudanese state’s discourse toward the international community, Khartoum has decided to send Dr. Kamil Idris, the Prime Minister, to lead Sudan’s delegation to the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly.

This decision, which came contrary to expectations that favored the participation of General Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan, Chairman of the Sovereignty Council, reflects a precise political reading of the current stage’s data and a meticulous distribution of roles within the power institutions. It employs civil and diplomatic tools within the project of restoring the state and its regional and international standing.

Kamil Idris, who has a long and honorable record in the United Nations system, is not a newcomer to these platforms. His presence at the head of Sudan’s delegation sends a clear message: Sudan is no longer content with condemning violations and rebellion from the position of a victim, but rather approaches the international community armed with legal and civil legitimacy to wage its diplomatic battle from the position of an active player capable of presenting its national narrative in institutional language based on facts.

While Al-Burhan had announced in New York last year a clear roadmap out of the crisis, based on forming a national technocratic government, amending the constitutional document, launching a Sudanese dialogue, and a transitional process extending for three years, Kamil Idris today represents the implementation of that roadmap and its practical embodiment as the head of the civil government promised to the international community.

From this standpoint, his presence at the United Nations is a reintroduction of the civil face of the Sudanese state at a moment that requires proving seriousness in fulfilling commitments.

Khartoum, by choosing to send Idris, is betting on investing his legal and international expertise to build a balanced discourse, but sharp in its clarity—a discourse that no longer suffices with explaining the crisis but goes further to demand a precise description of the nature of what is happening: an armed rebellion regionally supported, committing atrocities against civilians, and using foreign mercenaries to destabilize the state.

The shift in official discourse from a defensive tone to an offensive one is part of a new strategy that sees that international complacency in describing events and hesitation in taking decisive stances has directly contributed to prolonging the war and weakening the impact of international decisions, foremost among them Resolution 2736 issued by the Security Council, which called on the Rapid Support Forces to lift the siege on El Fasher and withdraw its forces from civilian areas.

In this context, Idris’s participation carries more than one message. First, it affirms that the civil transition project in Sudan has become a reality embodied in civil leaders who speak on behalf of the state and enjoy UN and constitutional recognition. Second, it is a smart direction of international efforts towards supporting the legitimate government instead of being drawn into vague approaches that equate the state with the rebels.

Third, it is an opportunity to redefine Sudan’s position on the international balance map as a rational partner seeking to build genuine peace based on dismantling the tools of violence, restoring state institutions, and achieving transitional justice.

The message Idris brings to New York is directed at governments, as well as global public opinion, organizations, and decision-making influence centers. Its message is that Sudan is not asking for charity but is demanding a fair partnership that places its security and stability at the core of regional and international equations and realizes that the continuation of the conflict not only threatens Sudan’s unity but opens the door to chaos, extremism, cross-border crime, and worsens migration and refugee crises.

This movement cannot be separated from the broader regional context. Sudan, due to its location on the Red Sea and its extension into the African depth, does not move in a vacuum. It is affected by and interacts with complex intersections including maritime security, energy balances, and the war of maritime routes. Therefore, a diplomatic participation of this kind also sends signals that Khartoum is ready to play a central role in regional balances—but on the basis of recognizing its sovereignty and supporting its civil path, not compromising it with hesitant positions or middle-ground solutions with the militia.

At the same time, Dr. Idris, with his expertise and international networks, is best suited to present the real concerns Sudan holds: from the explosion of the irregular migration crisis, to the danger of the expansion of armed groups in the state vacuum, to the use of the Sudanese crisis by some regional countries as a negotiation or pressure tool in issues unrelated to Sudan.

In summary, as we see it from #Face_of_Truth, the presence of Dr. Kamil Idris at the United Nations is a real test of Sudan’s ability to present its narrative to the world in the language of law and politics. His success in this mission may constitute a diplomatic breakthrough that repositions Sudan and undermines the militia’s narrative, while failure may open the door for adversaries to fill the vacuum and distort the image of the state. It is a decisive diplomatic battle, perhaps no less impactful than the battlefield, but it will undoubtedly contribute to shaping the features of the coming Sudan.

Wishing you all wellness and health.

Tuesday, August 23, 2025

Shglawi55@gmail.com